Aller au contenu principal
DocumentMS

Calculator

Document management ROI calculator

This calculator models the cost of your current process rather than promising a saving. You enter headcount, how long a document search takes, how often it fails, and what you spend on print and physical storage; it returns annual cost and the assumptions behind every figure.

Cost calculator

Not total headcount — the people who search for, file or approve documents in a normal week.

people

Salary plus employer costs, divided by working hours. Finance can give you this; a guess is usually 30–40% above the base hourly rate.

EUR

Count looking for an existing document, not creating one. Six is typical for an office role; support and claims roles run much higher.

per day

Time from deciding you need a document to having it open. Include asking a colleague, because that is the most common search method.

minutes

Proportion where the document is not found, the wrong version is found, or someone else has to be asked.

%

On top of the original search. Includes recreating a document that could not be found, which is the expensive case.

minutes

Printing, on-site storage space, off-site archive fees and retrieval charges. Facilities usually holds this figure.

EUR

Across every audit, inspection and disclosure request in a year. Counts the people gathering documents, not the auditors.

days

After holiday and typical absence. 225 is a common assumption in the UK and much of Europe.

days

Estimated annual cost

240 313 €

4 806 € per person per year · 6 638 hours

These are our default assumptions, not your numbers. Replace them above — the figure is only worth as much as the inputs behind it.

Where it goes

Searching for documents
157 500 €
Searches that fail
70 875 €
Assembling audit evidence
3 938 €
Print, storage and archive
8 000 €

Share these figures

Every input is in the URL, so a colleague opens exactly these numbers and can argue with any of them.

https://documentms.com/fr/resources/roi-calculator?staff=50&hourlyCost=35&searchesPerDay=6&minutesPerSearch=4&failureRatePercent=15&minutesPerFailure=12&physicalCostPerYear=8000&auditDaysPerYear=15&workingDaysPerYear=225

Show your working

How each figure is calculated

Printed in full, because a number nobody can reconstruct does not survive contact with a finance team.
Calculation for each cost component, using your current inputs
ComponentCalculationHours per yearCost per year
Searching50 people × 6 searches × 4 min × 225 days ÷ 604 500157 500 €
Failed searches15% of searches × 12 extra min ÷ 602 02570 875 €
Audit preparation15 person-days × 7.5 productive hours1133 938 €
Print, storage, archiveEntered directly—8 000 €
TotalHours × 35 € per hour, plus physical costs6 638240 313 €

Risk costs are excluded deliberately — a superseded version reaching a customer, a record that cannot be produced for a regulator, a fine, a lost claim. They are real and often larger than everything above, but assigning them a probability would be inventing a number. Treat the total as a floor.

FAQ

About this model

Why does this not show a saving?

Because we cannot honestly calculate one. A saving depends on how much of the current cost your implementation actually removes, which varies enormously by organisation and by how well the taxonomy is designed. What we can model is what the current process costs, from your own numbers — and that figure is what a business case needs.

Where do the default values come from?

They are conservative starting points, not research findings, and we would rather say so than dress them up. Every one is editable and the arithmetic is printed below the results, so you can replace our assumptions with your own and see exactly what changed.

Is search time really the biggest cost?

Usually, because it is continuous rather than episodic. Four minutes, six times a day, across fifty people, is around 1,100 hours a year before any search fails. Audit preparation feels more expensive because it arrives in a block, but it is generally the smaller number.

How should I present this to finance?

Share the URL — every input is in the query string, so a colleague opens the same figures and can challenge any of them. An assumption someone can argue with is more useful in a business case than a headline they cannot verify.

What is not included?

Risk costs, which are real and hard to quantify: a superseded version reaching a customer, a record that cannot be produced for a regulator, a fine, a lost claim. We have left them out rather than assign a probability we cannot defend, so treat the total as a floor.

Dernière revue: 2026-09-01. Next: what DocumentMS costs or the RFP checklist.

We will go through your assumptions on a call and tell you which ones look optimistic. An inflated business case fails at the second meeting, not the first.